Although first reports on mechanical thrombectomy included the use of aspiration catheters [12] and [13], only few
systematic data have been published on this approach so far. A recent single-center study reported on 22 patients (mean NIHSS 18) treated with aspiration thrombectomy alone with a recanalization rate of 81.9% and a good clinical outcome in 45.5% [14]. The Penumbra System (Penumbra, Almeda, USA) is a modification of the proximal aspiration technique. It has been FDA approved for clot removal in acute stroke treatment in 2007. It consists of a reperfusion catheter attached to continuous aspiration via a dedicated pumping system. A microwire with an olive-shaped tip, called separator, is used to fragmentize the Sirolimus mouse thrombus from proximal to distal and to avoid obstruction of the aspiration catheter by cleaning the catheter tip of clot fragments. Both reperfusion catheter and separator are available in various sizes and diameters (0.26–0.51 in.) to adjust the device to different anatomical settings and to allow thrombectomy even in distal branches such as M2 segments. The Penumbra System has been investigated in several single-center and multicenter trials. The Penumbra Pivotal Stroke
Trial [15] prospectively Olaparib purchase evaluated 125 stroke patients (mean NIHSS 18) within 8 h after onset of symptoms. Successful recanalization of the target vessel was achieved in 81.6%. Despite the relatively high recanalization rate, favorable clinical outcome IKBKE was achieved in only 25% of all patients and in 29% of patients with successful recanalization. Overall mortality was 32.8% and sICH occurred in 11.2% with serious adverse events in 3.2%. The
high recanalization rate in conjunction with the poor clinical outcome in this trial sparked the discussion on the impact of recanalization using mechanical thrombectomy. However, some single-center studies reported more favorable clinical results with the Penumbra System and then the Pivotal Trial with successful recanalization in 93%, good clinical outcome in 48% and reduced mortality of 11% [16]. Compared to IAT and the use of proximal devices, the use of distal thrombectomy devices is technically more complex. An 8 F sheath and balloon catheter of similar size are used. After placement of the balloon catheter in the internal carotid artery, a microcatheter (0.18–0.27 in.) is navigated across the occlusion site to pass the thrombus. The device is then introduced into the microcatheter and unsheathed behind the thrombus. This approach applies the retrieval force to the distal base of the thrombus. The device and thrombus are then retracted into the guide catheter under balloon occlusion and additional aspiration.