By the Late Holocene, such changes are global and pervasive in nature. The deep histories provided by archeology and paleoecology do not detract from our perceptions of the major environmental changes of the post-Industrial world. Instead, they add to them, showing a long-term trend in the increasing influence of humans on our planet, a trajectory that spikes dramatically during the last 100–200 years. They also illustrate the decisions past peoples made when confronted with ecological change or degradation and that these ancient peoples often grappled

with some of the same issues we are confronting C59 order today. Archeology alone does not hold the answer to when the Anthropocene began, but it provides valuable insights and raises fundamental questions about defining a geological epoch based on narrowly defined and recent human impacts (e.g., CO2 and nuclear emissions). While Kinase Inhibitor Library mouse debate will continue on the onset, scope, and definition of the Anthropocene, it is clear that Earth’s ecosystems and climate are rapidly deteriorating and that much of this change is due to human activities. As issues such as extinction, habitat loss, pollution, and sea level rise grow increasingly problematic, we need new approaches to help manage and sustain the

biodiversity and ecology of our planet into the future. Archeology, history, and paleobiology offer important perspectives for modern environmental management by documenting how organisms and ecosystems functioned in the past and responded to a range of anthropogenic and climatic changes. Return to pristine “pre-human” or “natural” baselines may be impossible, but archeological records can help define a range of desired future conditions that are key components for restoring and managing ecosystems. As we grapple with the politics of managing the “natural” world, one of the lessons from archeology is that attempts to completely erase people from the natural landscape (Pleistocene rewilding, de-extinction, G protein-coupled receptor kinase etc.) and return to a pre-human baseline are often not realistic and may create new problems that potentially undermine

ecosystem resilience. Given the level of uncertainty involved in managing for future biological and ecological change, we need as much information as possible, and archeology and other historical sciences can play an important role in this endeavor. A key part of this will be making archeological and paleoecological data (plant and animal remains, soils data, artifacts, household and village structure, etc.) more applicable to contemporary issues by bridging the gap between the material record of archeology and modern ecological datasets, an effort often best accomplished by interdisciplinary research teams. This paper was originally presented at the 2013 Society for American Archaeology Annual Meeting in Honolulu, Hawai’i.