In agreement with previous results [22], Table 1

In agreement with previous results [22], Table 1 Emricasan supplier shows the maintenance of high polyP level in late stationary phase cells grown in MT + P. Differences in tolerance due to media Pi concentration were also observed using LB and LB + P, defined as LB containing 40 mM phosphate buffer pH 7 [23], (data not shown). Figure 1 Copper tolerance in stationary phase cells. Copper tolerance of 48 h MT or MT + P growing cells of the indicated strains (panels

A-F) was determined after one-hour exposure with different copper concentrations. Serial dilutions of cells incubated without copper (control) or treated cultures were spotted in LB-agar plates. The last spot of each strip was loaded with 1/100000 dilution of eFT508 cell line original cultures. Data are representative of at least four independent experiments. Table 1 PolyP levels during growth in different Pi concentrations media   polyP (AU)*   MC4100 ppk − ppx − ppx − pitA − pitB − pitA − pitB   MT MT + P MT MT + P MT MT + P MT MT + P MT MT + P MT MT + P 6 h 123650 ± 10540a 152951 ± 8120a 45541 ± 5563a 38254 ± 4521a 220152 ± 15120a 252651 ± 11120a 80524 ± 9452a 91523 ± 8563a 82536 ± 8652a 95623 ± 9563a 81524 ± 9452a 90523 ± 5563a 24 h 54000 ± 9500b 125420 ± 10245a 42564 ± 4521a

40251 ± 6523a 200536 ± 16245a 241536 ± 12155a 32564 ± 4152b 93056 ± 6652a 24563 ± 3254b 89654 ± 10254a 28564 ± 4152b 88056 ± 8652a 48 h 44652 ± 4556b 138456 ± 8486a 38563 ± 7521a 41251 ± 5125a 208456 ± 12486a 238456 ± 10286a 22563 ± 5634b 89862 ± 4128a 32564 ± 4635b 92365 ± 8365a 20563 ± 5634b 91862 ± 4658a *Fluorescence 550 nm. For each strain, different SC79 nmr letters indicate significant differences among conditions according to Tukey’s test with a p-value of 0.05. As a first step to elucidate the differential copper tolerance in cells grown in MT or MT + P for 48 h, assays using ppk − ppx − (unable to synthesize/degrade polyP [24, 25]) and ppx − (unable Selleckchem Fludarabine to degrade polyP) cells were performed in these conditions. Both mutants were highly sensitive to metal even in MT + P

(Figure 1B and C). Note that, polyP levels in ppx − strain were always high, independently of the growth phase and the media used, while the ppkppx mutant exhibits greatly reduced synthesis of polyP, evidenced by low values of fluorescence emission (Table 1). The implication of Pit system components in copper tolerance was also analyzed using E. coli strains lacking one or both transporter encoding genes (Figure 1D-F). pitA and pitB single mutants were unable to tolerate 0.5 mM Cu2+ in both media. This sensitivity was more pronounced in the pitApitB double mutant. It is worth noting that polyP levels in Pit system mutants depended on media Pi concentration, similarly to WT (Table 1). Above results using different strains and culture media support the idea that stationary phase copper tolerance is mediated by a mechanism which involves both polyP metabolism and Pit system.

Comments are closed.