The limited number of patients in whom antibodies were observed a

The limited number of patients in whom antibodies were observed and the short study duration precluded meaningful analysis of potential correlations of pharmacokinetics and efficacy with immunogenicity. Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab induction therapy were evaluated in this randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study of patients with moderately to severely active CD. In the TNF antagonist–failure population (∼75% of patients), there were high rates of long-standing disease, prior CD surgery, Selleckchem MEK inhibitor history of fistulizing disease, baseline CRP and fecal calprotectin

increases, and prior failure of immunosuppressives and multiple TNF antagonists. In the TNF antagonist–failure population, vedolizumab was not statistically superior to placebo for inducing clinical remission at week 6. However, secondary and exploratory outcome results suggest that vedolizumab had clinically relevant activity in TNF antagonist–failure and TNF

antagonist–naive patients. Collectively, the primary and secondary outcome results suggest that in patients with CD and previous TNF antagonist failure, effects of vedolizumab on clinical remission may not become evident until between weeks 6 and 10. Week 10 secondary outcomes were prespecified to test the hypothesis that the time to achieve remission with vedolizumab Dinaciclib may be 10 weeks in patients with CD, particularly in patients with previous TNF antagonist failure. Results in the TNF antagonist–failure Edoxaban population showed a clinically important increase over time in the proportion of vedolizumab-treated patients in remission, from 15.2% at week 6 to 26.6% at week

10. However, the remission rate in placebo-treated patients remained constant at 12.1% at weeks 6 and 10. Similar analyses of the overall population showed more vedolizumab-treated patients (19.1%) than placebo-treated patients (12.1%) in clinical remission at week 6 (treatment difference, 7.0%; 95% CI, 0.1%–13.8%; P = .048). This difference resulted from the more robust effect on this outcome in the smaller TNF antagonist–naive subgroup, which comprised 24% of the overall population. On the basis of observed differences among the TNF antagonist–naive subgroups in GEMINI 2 and 3, vedolizumab (similar to TNF antagonists) may have a more pronounced effect before the onset of structural damage, as indirectly gauged by shorter disease duration and lack of prior CD surgery. These disease characteristics were considerably more common in TNF antagonist–naive patients than in patients with prior TNF antagonist failure. Similar trends toward more pronounced effects of treatment in TNF antagonist–naive patients also have been seen with the use of a second or third TNF antagonist and with natalizumab.

Comments are closed.