Therefore, our findings may have potential relevance in therapeutic settings, where IL-2 stimulation is used and considerable numbers of iTreg cells are present in the circulation or the malignant tissue. In these cases, tumor iTreg cells could limit the target cell-independent effects and possibly side-effects of IL-2-activated NK cells. According to our data, this effect of iTreg cells would, for example, affect target-cell-independent cytokine secretion of NK cells. By our experiments we cannot determine whether the inhibitory activity of iTreg cells also requires the activation of iTreg cells by

IL-2, which is present in the system. On the other hand, we feel that our system reflects a physiological situation, such as therapeutic IL-2 application, where both NK and iTreg cells will be simultaneously exposed to the cytokine. In this situation, NU7441 datasheet Selleckchem BAY 57-1293 iTreg cells will inhibit NK in the absence of target (Fig. 2), while in the presence of target cells iTreg cells will be non-inhibitory and rather enhance NK degranulation (Fig. 6). In contrast, iTreg cells seemed to promote natural cytotoxicity of unstimulated resting NK cells. This situation reflects the steady-state or homeostatic conditions within

a given tumor tissue or tumor microenvironment. The clinical correlates for our in vitro findings are those patients and clinical studies of solid as well as non-solid tumors in which investigators found tumor-infiltrating Treg cells to be a good prognostic factor 29–32. Examples include lymphomas as Hodgkin lymphoma where investigators found a positive correlation between high Treg cell infiltration

and higher rates of survival 32. Consistent with our in vitro data, other groups have reported that an improved survival was associated with high density of tumor-infiltrating Low-density-lipoprotein receptor kinase FoxP3+ Treg cells in colorectal cancer 30, 33. Further, Badoual et al. reported that Treg cells are positively correlated with locoregional control in patients with head and neck cancer. They concluded that this effect may be facilitated by Treg cells which downregulate harmful inflammatory reactions, which could favor tumor progression 29. Our data suggest that an additional mechanism to explain these findings may be direct activation of naive NK cells by tumor iTreg cells. On the other hand, many clinical studies suggest that Treg cells contribute to tumor-induced immune suppression, and elimination of Treg cells may represent a possible new therapeutic option 5, 34. However, at present there is no clear evidence from human clinical trials demonstrating the clinical efficacy of this approach. It is important to note that tumor-induced Treg cells may have different effects in the natural tumor microenvironment and the immunotherapeutic setting. This is reflected by the differential effect of iTreg cells on IL-2-stimulated versus unstimulated NK cells in our study.