To ensure accuracy of CoaguChek XS participants were required to undergo two sets of comparison POC and pathology tests during Volasertib research buy a run-in phase prior to the commencement of the intervention. Each pair of POC and pathology tests was conducted within 4 h of each other. If on two occasions a CoaguChek XS test result differed by more than
15% from the laboratory value further comparison tests were conducted, to a maximum of four tests. If the comparison tests still differed by more than 15% the patient was excluded from the study. The local pathology collection service collected blood for the laboratory INR. Following the run-in phase, patients were monitored once a week for up to 12 weeks by trained nursing staff using the CoaguChek XS POC monitor. INR results
from the 12 months preceding the study were provided to the research selleck screening library team by GPs for each patient as part of enrolment into the study. Data was stored using the MedePOC software during the study and was de-identified following completion of the study for data analysis. The primary outcome was the TTR, expressed as a percentage of the time the patient spent within their target INR range during the study period. The TTR in the 12 week intervention phase was compared to the TTR in the 12 months preceding the study. The target INR range for each patient was confirmed by the GP. The calculation used to determine the TTR was based on the method proposed by Rosendaal et al.[21] This method assumes that the INR values change linearly between successive measures. Paired t tests were used to determine whether any significant change
had occurred compared medroxyprogesterone to baseline. As there is sometimes a tendency for GPs to maintain the INR towards the lower margin of the therapeutic range in older patients and to not increase the dose of warfarin if the INR is slightly below the nominal target range, a post hoc analysis was conducted to test this observation. In this analysis, expanded therapeutic ranges were used to analyse INR data from the intervention and the preceding 12 months. INR target ranges were expanded from 2.0–3.0 to 1.8–3.0 INR units and from 2.5–3.5 to 2.3–3.5 INR units. Other outcomes included the number of INR tests in range and the nursing staff, GP and patient satisfaction with the POC testing and communication process. The latter was assessed with questionnaires utilising visual analogue scale questions and multiple-choice questions. The visual analogue scales ranged from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’. Responses were converted to a score by measuring the response on the visual analogue scale from ‘strongly disagree’, which was attributed a score of 0, to ‘strongly agree’, which was attributed a score of 10. Data are presented as medians with range denoting the 10th and 90th percentiles.