In order to explore whether and how unspecific binding can be detected we used anti-human IgG instead of anti-human IgM as secondary antibodies for the detection of human monoclonal anti-P1 IgM antibody binding to P1. In this setting we assayed the binding to the regular P1-beads or the P1-beads modified

selleck compound with heterobifunctional PEGs by using progressively higher dilutions of the anti-P1 IgM antibody. The results (Fig. 5B) essentially showed that regular P1-beads exhibited substantial unspecific binding which was notably substantially reduced near to the technical cut-off level of the method (approx. 10 MFI) with both heterobifunctional modified PEG P1-beads (30-fold for PEG23 and 6-fold for PEG60).

A decrease of binding to regular buy Obeticholic Acid P1-beads with progressively decreasing anti-P1 IgM antibody concentrations was not observed. These results suggest that commercial anti-P1 IgM antibodies may contain traces of unspecific (heterophilic) antibodies of IgG class which bind directly to the bead. We also performed a similar experiment with biot-PEG50- and biot-PEG280-modified beads (see above), but did not observe any difference in unspecific binding between these biotinylated PEG-modified and regular P1-beads (data not shown). This indicates that only bead modifications with heterobifunctional PEGs but not the end-point addition of biot-PEG prevented unspecific binding of non-target antibodies. Because the nature of this unspecific IgG-mediated binding was unknown we assayed P1-, PEG23-, and PEG60-P1 beads with several non-related anti-glycan antibodies of IgM class (anti-Atri, anti-Bdi, anti-LacNAc, anti-3′-su-LacNAc, anti-α-Rha) which we purified from human ascites fluid and plasma. Regardless of the bead type we found

that LacNAc (Galβ1–4GlcNacβ) antibodies cross-reacted with P1 to some extent (MFI from 300 to 450) whereas the other antibodies cross-reacted to P1 only minimally (MFI of less than 100) (ESM, Fig. 2). However, in a similar setting Unoprostone with the respective IgG class antibodies (and also a commercial monoclonal mouse anti-Pk IgG antibody) we found substantial cross-reactivity of these IgG class antibodies to P1 with the regular beads (MFI from 700 to 900) but not with the heterobifunctional PEG P1-beads (MFIs below 200) (Fig. 6A). These results indicate that the observed cross-reactivity (unspecific binding) may be largely attributed to the IgG class of the anti-glycan antibodies. For comparison the binding of the monoclonal anti-Pk IgG antibody to the P1-beads is included, showing the extent of the cross-reactivity of the anti-Pk antibody to P1 (Fig. 6A). The cross-reactive binding of anti-Pk IgG to P1 may, even with monoclonal antibodies, not be surprising, because Pk and P1 share the same terminal disaccharide motif.