“
“OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of collaborative maternity care for a socioeconomically diverse patient population in a California community hospital.
METHODS: Collaborative practice structure and clinical guidelines were analyzed, as were de-identified electronic medical records for all primiparous women who delivered β-Nicotinamide mw term singletons between 2000 and 2010 (N = 4,426). Demographics, care processes, and perinatal outcomes were compared among women seen prenatally in a private collaborative
practice compared with a Federally Qualified Health Center prenatal clinic run by nurse-midwives.
RESULTS: Evidence-based practices were used to achieve excellent perinatal outcomes. Three quarters of women received intrapartum nurse-midwifery care (74.4%).
Few differences were seen in management or outcomes among women from different prenatal clinics despite significant variation in demographic and clinical characteristics. Private practice patients were older, less likely to be obese, and more likely to speak English compared with counterparts from public health clinics. They were also more likely to use hydrotherapy or epidural analgesia, or experience severe perineal laceration and repair. Overall, pharmacologic pain relief methods were limited: less than a quarter of primiparous women used narcotics (21.2%), epidural analgesia (23.7%), or warm water immersion (23.2%). Labor induction and augmentation, and cesarean delivery rates (12.5%), were similar among groups and low overall.
CONCLUSION: A collaborative Danusertib clinical trial practice of low-tech, high-touch care results in high-quality maternity services. The care model holds promise for replication to address health disparities by limiting obstetric interventions and warrants further investigation with regard to associated costs and resultant outcomes.”
“Rationale: Rapid response teams (RRTs) are intended to stabilize deteriorating patients on the ward, but recent studies suggest that RRTs may also improve end-of-life care (EOLC). We sought to study
the effect of introducing an RRT on EOLC at our institutions, and compare the EOLC care received by patients who were consulted by the RRT with that of patients who were not consulted by the RRT.
Methods: Retrospective review of 450 consecutive Temsirolimus research buy deaths at 3 institutions. We compared demographic factors and EOLC received before (2005) and 5 years after (2010) the introduction of an RRT. We also compared these same factors for patients who died in 2010 with and without RRT consultation.
Results: There were no differences in the proportion of patients who had Patient/Family Conferences or orders to limit life support on the ward between 2005 and 2010. Although the RRT was consulted for 30% of patients eligible to be seen by the RRT, the RRT was involved in only 11.1% of Patient/Family Conferences that took place on the ward.