Prescribed burning is used as a management tool in various North-American grassland types, mainly in tall-grass and short-grass prairies and Mediterranean annual grasslands. In the following section, we summarize the most important experiences of North-American burning practices which could, at least partly, be adapted

to European grasslands. find more Timing of burning. In North-America both dormant- and growing-season burning are applied to achieve management goals considering the phenology (e.g. germination, seed set and dispersal) of target and unwanted species ( Pyke, Brooks, & D’Antonio 2010). Dormant-season burning is most effective for the reduction of accumulated litter ( Rowe 2010). Natural fire regimes are best simulated by growing-season mid-July burns, at the peak of lightning-season ( Howe 1994). Most prescribed burning is applied in the spring in the USA, but summer burning is also applied ( Fuhlendorf, Engle, Kerby, & Hamilton 2009). Summer fires can be used (i) to suppress unwanted species in a phenological state most susceptible to fire; or (ii) to give advantage to early-growing species which

can regenerate after fire in autumn ( Howe 1994). Summer fires can cause serious damages in grassland species, as most plant and animal species are active in this period ( Fuhlendorf et al. 2009). Besides burning season, fire effects also depend on fuel moisture and check details weather conditions ( Twidwell, Fuhlendorf, Engle, & Taylor 2012). Frequency of burning. To mimic natural disturbance regimes and maintain grassland biodiversity, burning every 2–3 years is recommended in tallgrass prairies ( Fuhlendorf et al. 2009). This interval resembles most the natural

wildfire regimes required for the regeneration of grasslands ( Rowe 2010). To control invasive species, high-frequency burning in several consecutive years is needed. Repeated burning may prevent the regeneration of the invasive species from vegetative buds or seed bank, and burning should be repeated until the seed bank of the invasive species is destroyed and there is a low risk of re-colonization ( Alexander and D’Antonio, 2003 and Pyke et al., until 2010). Combination of grazing and burning – patch-burning. Fire and grazing interact through positive and negative feedbacks resulting in a shifting spatial and temporal mosaic (fire-grazing model; Fuhlendorf & Engle 2001). The model is based on the principle that free-ranging grazers preferentially select recently burned patches with high-quality forage for grazing. Grazers rarely choose patches that have not been burnt for several years. This leads to litter and biomass accumulation, increased fuel loads and a higher probability of wildfires there.