The other half used the palatal plates for 14 days before roughness readings were performed (FRa group, n = 5). The surface roughness (Ra) of the inner surface from the relined dentures was recorded using a Surftest SJ-401 with eight readings per specimen, and mean values were obtained. Data (μm) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). IRa means (2.92 ± 0.87 μm) www.selleckchem.com/products/apo866-fk866.html and FRa means (3.35 ± 0.65 μm) were significantly different (p = 0.016). UG showed a lower (p = 0.01) Ra mean (2.1 ± 0.52 μm) than DF (3.94 ± 0.81 μm), TS (4.12 ± 0.64 μm), and DS (3.27 ± 0.64

μm). Ufi Gel P showed the smoothest surface among the materials evaluated. The period of use resulted in changes in the surface roughness of the materials tested. “
“The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the total color difference (ΔE) between natural teeth and fabricated crowns from three ceramic systems

with different thicknesses. The color of ninety maxillary central incisors was measured selleck compound from the middle third of the labial surface with a Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer. All-ceramic crown preparations with different thicknesses (0.8, 1.2, 1.5 mm) were done on selected teeth (n = 30). Prepared teeth were randomly divided into three equal groups to fabricate ceramic crowns from three ceramic systems, Duceram LFC (DLFC), In-Ceram SPINELL (ICS), and IPS Empress (IPSE). Colors of cemented crowns were MCE公司 measured and compared with their corresponding measurements before preparations. Data were statistically analyzed

using two-way ANOVA at 5% significance level. A significant difference of ΔE was detected between natural teeth and different thicknesses of crowns constructed from the all-ceramic materials investigated. Comparing the three materials at 0.8 mm thickness revealed that the lowest ΔE was recorded for DLFC, which was significantly different from the other ceramic systems while IPSE showed the highest ΔE. At higher thicknesses there was no difference between natural tooth shade and crowns constructed from different ceramic materials. Reinforcement of ceramics by alumina for In-Ceram and leucite for Empress decreases color production. Level of acceptance between the different ceramic materials and thicknesses varied. DLFC showed the highest color matching at all thicknesses followed by ICS and IPSE in descending order. In general, increasing the thickness of fabricated crowns enhances color match. “
“Purpose: To compare the volumetric misfit between implant restorative platforms of implants and implant frameworks manufactured with two different technologies. One set of implant frameworks was made with a CAD/CAM protocol and a tactile probe; the second protocol consisted of frameworks made with the lost-wax technique and conventional casting technology. Materials and Methods: In this laboratory study, an acrylic resin model with five “inter-foraminal” implants was used as the “patient” model.